Sunday, May 23, 2010

Aussie News 6

A NOSE for trouble has led this dogged trooper from life in a cage to dodging death on Afghanistan's front lines.

Military "operational reasons" have cast a pall of secrecy over Bundy's early life. But close to three years ago, the labrador-staffordshire cross was rescued from an uncertain future in a pound, somewhere in Australia.

The military put him to work, training him to detect explosives.

Now, with his handler Sapper David Brown, he's putting his life on the line for his country, sharing responsibility for keeping a team of engineers alive.

The three-year-old is certified to sniff out everything from the Taliban's weapon of choice, improvised roadside bombs, to armaments caches.

"The dog and myself will be sent forward to clear the road and look for explosives," Spr Brown said. If Bundy senses something, "we get out of harm's way and let the other boys do their job."

Spr Brown, who completed his own training two years ago, has to be entirely in tune with Bundy to know when he's found something.

"He will indicate, or his tail will start to wag a bit faster. And I will call him back before he goes too far," he said.

"He's wagging his tail because he's shown interest in something. It's all part of a game for him.

"He comes back, and he gets all excited because he gets to play with me," Spr Brown said.

"He's had a couple of finds over here. He's very keen to work."

And Bundy loves nothing more than cooling down after a day spent in what is often a climatic as well as a military hot zone.

"Whenever he's near water, he loves to jump in it and cool down," Spr Brown said. "He jumps in puddles and he will sit there and lie down in it and look back at me."

After 12 months together Bundy and Spr Brown, of Footscray - who's on his first tour of Afghanistan - share quite a bond.

"He responds quite quickly to my verbal commands, or if he's looking at me I can use hand commands," Spr Brown said.

And the duo are also a hit with their comrades in the reconstruction task force operating out of Tarin Kowt, in the south.

"The boys love to pat him. Whenever we're back in base, he gets lots of pats," Spr Brown said.

"Whenever we go anywhere, it's always: 'Hello, Bundy. How you going, mate?"' he said.

"It's never Brownie."


Comments:

Bundy was rescued from a pound somewhere in Australia and sent to the frontline of Afghanistan to serve for his country. He is a very smart dog in fact. He is trained to sniff out almost everything from Taliban's weapons, improvised roadside bombs, to armaments caches. He is also an obedient dog because according to his handler Sapper David Brown, Bundy responds quite quickly to his verbal commands and if he is looking for him, he can even use hand commands. Sapper David and Bundy also make a hit with their comrades.

However, is Bundy lucky or unlucky to be found and put into work in the frontline, facing dodging death everyday? Bundy is trained to discover weapons, bombs and when he finds something he will wag his tail showing his excitement and indicating the other comrades. Yet he doesn't know what he has just found may kill him one day!

I sympathise with Bundy because in the pound he can only wait for an uncertain future. If he is fortunate, he might be sent to a farm in which his life might be much better and safer than now he is or sent to a rich man's house as a pet as which he might have a comfortable and luxurious life.But if he is unfortunate, he might be slaughtered and served as a delicious meal for those who find eating dog's meat as their cup of tea. And, now he is putting his own life to contribute for the country. This may be better as at least he is serving for his country but may be even worse as he might be killed before he ever know.

Sign, what a pitiful life. If you were Bundy which life will you choose, staying in the pound for unknown future or risking its life in the battlefield? In short we should treasure our lives because we at least have a choice for our future, deciding our own path, unlike Bundy who can only lead a pathetic and unfair life. Hence, starting from this moment onwards, everyone please don't cry for your bad luck anymore. Take it as a test and you'll find tomorrow better.

Friday, May 21, 2010

Aussie News 5

Australian dollar continues falling as investors flee currency market

THE Aussie dollar has taken another beating, opening nearly 1.5US cents lower this morning after more "carnage'' on overseas markets.

And forecasters say there is no immediate relief in sight for investors, with the dollar expected to drop as low as $US0.8090 in trading today.

At 7am, the Australian dollar was trading at $US0.8169/74, down 1.72 per cent from yesterday's close of $US0.8314/16.

An unexpected rise in US jobless claims and ongoing concerns about the Eurozone debt crisis depressed investor confidence about global economic recovery.

Since 5pm yesterday, the local unit traded between $US0.8360 and $US0.8149, its lowest level since July 2009.

The local currency has depreciated 12.3 per cent since the end of April 30.

For consumers, the drop will push up the prices of imported electrical goods and cars.

The fall in the dollar follows another shocking day of trade on the Australian share market, with the S&P/ASX200 last night closing down 70.6 points, or 1.61 per cent, at 4,316.5 points, while the broader All Ordinaries index fell 71.9 points, or 1.63 per cent, to 4,342.4 points.

Overnight the Dow Jones Industrial Average index closed down 3.60 per cent, its third straight day of losses and its biggest percentage drop in more than a year.

Bank of New Zealand currency strategist, Mike Jones, said high risk assets such as equities, commodities and currencies such as the Australian dollar continued to weaken following more ``carnage'' on financial markets.

"We are seeing worries continue to mount that the European sovereign debt crisis is starting to derail, or at least slow the global economic recovery,'' Mr Jones said from Wellington.

"That has taken a harsh toll on equity markets and commodity prices.

"There has been a clearout on equities and the risk sensitive currencies, with the Aussie at the forefront of that clearout.''

The Australian dollar is considered a high-risk currency as it is linked to the global economic recovery, so signs of weaker economic growth across the world will hinder the domestic unit.

Mr Jones forecast the local dollar would trade between $US0.8090 and $US0.8250 during today's local session.

"The current backdrop of deteriorating risk appetite and widespread pessimism about the global recovery mean the Aussie dollar would be expected to keep falling today,'' he said.

Mr Jones said the Australian dollar would gain its direction today from Asian equity markets' reaction to the very sharp fall in the US and Europe overnight.

Comments:

As learned in Economic class, this article catch my attention and I would like to share with the others. A country's currency falls because the demand of the country's currency drops, causing the supply of this currency to have surplus. In illustration, the supply of the currency increases, shifting to the right in the market of the currency.This pushes down the currency, meaning that each Aussie dollar can only buy less US dollars ( normally measured in US dollars ). The main underlying reason is that an unexpected rise In US jobless claims and ongoing concerns about the European debt crisis depressed the investors' confidence about global economic recovery. As a result, there is a clearout on equities and risk sensitive currency. Aussie dollars are the forefront of the clearout because it depends highly on the global economic situation. Deteriorating risk appetite and widespread pessimism cause expectation that Aussie dollars will continue to fall.

Thursday, May 20, 2010

Australia News 4

Good sleepers live longer

RESEARCHERS say the best length for a nightly sleep is around seven hours.

Researchers from the University of Warwick and the Federico II University in Naples studied the nightly habits of thousands of people and found poor sleepers are 12 per cent more likely to die prematurely than those who get six to eight hours.

Their findings provide the most convincing evidence yet of a link between too little sleep and an increased risk of early death. Many people sleep five hours or less a night.

Long sleepers could also be in trouble.

While over-sleeping does not in itself increase the risk of death, it can be a significant marker of an underlying serious illness.

The findings published in journal Sleep today coincide with the release of a separate American study that found older people tend to sleep better - the opposite of what was previously thought.


Comments:

It is definitely better to sleep more than six hours a day. One of the underlying reasons is that our body needs rest after a long day of "non-stop working". Enough sleeping is very essential particularly for children and teenagers because their bodies need a lot of time for rest and thus encourage a more healthier growth. Good sleepers are also found to be more efficient and productive in doing things because they have the energy to concentrate in their studies. Besides, early nightly sleeping also can contribute to our health, especially that the pimples on face can reduce greatly^^ So, all my friends let's start early nightly sleep now.

Television Viewing Draft 2

Television is created in the past to serve as a tool to provide entertainment for us. As evidenced in the America Time Use Survey (2003), the population in United States catagorised into female and male in the survey averagely spend 2.5 to 2.75 hours per day to watch television during their leisure time. Besides, another survey in United Kingdom, UK Time Use Survey (2000) also depicted a similar result. This shows that there are certainly many benefits in watching television. However, some skeptics of this issue argue that watching television is not beneficial but on the other hand it brings a lot of adverse effects to the viewers. It has become a provocative national interest to discuss whether television viewing is beneficial or detrimental to the viewers. I strongly assert that television viewing brings more advantages than disadvantages. Therefore, it is significant for us to discuss the importance of television viewing which include that it helps the viewers to gain knowledge, to think critically and to assuage stress.

Firstly, television programmes provide a variety of information for the viewers, enabling different groups of viewers to gain knowledge that they want. For example, children before they reach the age to enter kindergarten, they can commence learning colours, numbers and letters from programmes like ‘Sesame Street’ (Rutherford 2002). In addition, for teenagers, they can get knowledge ranging widely from animal kingdom, geography, astronomy, general knowledge, contemporary issues and science from television (Rutherford 2002). These knowledge are important and are always not found in the textbook. Teenager with little of these knowledge can learn better from television because convoluted scientific questions are explained in a diverting and pleasurable way (Rutherford 2002). In fact, they can remember better through programmes because they do not merely see and read but also listen. (Leigh 2001). Besides, they can also comprehend their cultural uniqueness and the role of the other cultures to the nation through television viewing.

Furthermore, television viewing can stimulate the viewers’ critical thinking. Critical thinking is an indispensable skill to socialize as well as to excel in studies. It can help to resolve many setbacks in life. As an illustration, family can learn how to solve conflicts more appropriately after watching programmes which show solutions to these problems (Sharif 1999). More importantly, television programmes encourage critical thinking which is also essential in analysing global issues. Viewers can learn about various significant world issues ranging from globalization to homelessness (Leigh 2001). In this way, they can also become more involved in the society. Since they know about current issues, they can voice for their rights so that the councils, major companies and national governments take their needs into consideration more seriously when making decisions. As such, television can be said to be a force of democracy (Rutherford 2002). In addition to this, viewers can be aware of global problems such as the famine in Africa. Exposing news to the viewers is vital because the victims of catastrophes need helps urgently. Hence, television viewers can contribute their help, for instance, by donating to assist the victims (Sharif 1999).

Lastly, television viewing can alleviate stress of the viewers. Viewers, particularly, teenagers who are still in school need entertainment after a solid school day. As the saying goes, “all work and no play makes Jack a dull boy”. Teenagers will feel fatigued, pressured when their teachers and parents’ expectations on them to get good result increases. By watching television, they can concentrate on the shows and forget about all the hassle temporarily. After that, they feel recharged and more motivated to finish their homework. Moreover, they can use television viewing as an opportunity to regain their focus and hence, will be able to view problems from another different perspective (Rutherford 2002).

In a nutshell, it is apparently true that television viewing is advantageous for the viewers if moderation is practised (Rutherford 2002). Everything has two sides of it, bad and good. As human beings, we should be able to differentiate these two and adapt only the good one. The effects of television viewing can be disastrous if we are to become couch potatoes, though, by managing our time wisely, we, in fact, can gain abundant benefits from television viewing.

Tuesday, May 18, 2010

Australia News 3

A GRIEVING father cried with relief and joy after a jury found his ex-wife guilty of murdering his two little boys.

It was the second time David Fitchett had been put through the agony of a trial. Donna Fitchett, 51, was convicted of killing Thomas, 11, and Matthew, 9.

Mr Fitchett said outside court two juries had now got it right.

"Another 12 people saw through the absolute shallow, shallow, pathetic defence she put up," he said.

"She is a manipulative, cunning, street-smart woman and she knew all along what she was doing was wrong."

But Mr Fitchett cannot forgive the system that allowed his ex-wife to drag out his pain. She was convicted and jailed for 18 years but granted a retrial last year on a technicality.

"The law is a joke. The law is an ass," Mr Fitchett said.

"One judge got one sentence wrong, so we had to go to a retrial."

Asked if he had a message for his ex-wife, Mr Fitchett replied: "You don't want to hear it. You don't want to know about it."

He walked from court flanked by supporters who cheered: "For the boys!"

Donna Fitchett drugged and smothered or strangled her sons at their Balwyn North home in September 2005.

The Supreme Court jury of eight women and four men returned their verdict after just four hours.

They rejected a claim the mother was mentally impaired and so depressed she thought killing the boys was her "greatest act of love".

The court heard Fitchett killed her boys after deciding her marriage was intolerable and over.

She told her husband to enjoy the Father's Day weekend because it "would be their last as a family".

The qualified nurse gave her sons a cocktail of prescription drugs and put them to bed.

Fitchett used a sock to strangle Thomas and then placed a pillow over the face of Matthew as he struggled.

She then took some pills herself and wrote a letter to her husband.

But before Fitchett could take her own life Mr Fitchett arrived home.

In a letter to her psychologist Fitchett wrote: "I am not a coward nor am I crazy."

And the jury agreed.

Justice Elizabeth Curtain remanded Fitchett in custody for a plea hearing on a date to be fixed.

Comments:
Another news about homicides was found in the online newspaper. This shows the seriousness of our society's situation where the social security is in a bad condition. Everyday we can't pass without hearing any news about murders. Therefore, some drastic actions should be carried out to curb this social problem. For example, government should not only regulate stricter rules but also announce the decisions to the public so that the message can be passed to all the people. Thus this can alert those who have the intention to commit crime to think twice before they do any reckless actions. Besides, all of us should be more aware of our own safety. We should not easily trust any stranger and even follow them to somewhere else. Girls should be extra careful because they are vulnerable as compared to guys because they are smaller in size and weaker in strength. All in all, all levels of societies should work hand in hand to bring the crime rate down.

Monday, May 17, 2010

Television Viewing Draft 1

Television is created in the past to serve as a tool to provide entertainment for us. As evidenced in the America Time Use Survey (2003), the population in United States catagorised into female and male in the survey averagely spend 2.5 to 2.75 hours per day to watch television during their leisure time. Besides, another survey in United Kingdom, UK Time Use Survey (2000) also depicted a similar result. This shows that there are certainly many benefits in watching television. However, some skeptics of this issue argue that watching television is not beneficial but on the other hand it brings a lot of adverse effects to the viewers. It has become a provocative national interest to discuss whether television viewing is beneficial or detrimental to the viewers. I strongly assert that television viewing will bring more advantages than disadvantages. Therefore, it is significant for us to discuss the importance of television viewing which include that it helps the viewers to gian knowledge, to think critically and to assuage stress.

Firstly, television programmes provide a variety of information for the viewers, enabling different groups of viewers to gain knowledge that they want. For example, children before they reach the age to enter kindergarten, they can commence learning colours, numbers and letters from programmes like ‘Sesame Street’ (Rutherford 2002). In addition, for teenagers, they can learn knowledge ranging widely from animal kingdom, geography, astronomy, general knowledge, contemporary issues and science from television (Rutherford 2002). These knowledge are important and are always not found in the textbook. Teenager with little of these knowledge can learn better from television because convoluted scientific questions are explained in a diverting and pleasurable way (Rutherford 2002). In fact, they can remember better through programmes because they do not merely see and read but also listen. (Leigh 2001). Besides, they can also comprehend their cultural uniqueness and the role of the other cultures to the nation through television viewing.

Furthermore, television viewing can stimulate the viewers’ critical thinking. Critical thinking is an indispensable skill to socialize as well as to excel in studies. It can help to resolve many setbacks in life. As an illustration, family can learn how to solve conflicts more appropriately after watching programmes which show solutions to these problems (Sharif 1999). More importantly, television programmes encourage critical thinking which is also essential in analysing global issues. Viewers can learn about various significant world issues ranging from globalization to homelessness (Leigh 2001). In this way, they can also become more involved in the society. Since they know about current issues, they can voice for their rights so that the councils, major companies and national governments take their needs into consideration more seriously when making decisions. As such, television can be said to be a force of democracy (Rutherford 2002). In addition to this, viewers can be aware of global problems such as the famine in Africa. Exposing news to the viewers is vital because the victims of catastrophes need help urgently. Hence, television viewers can contribute their help, for instance, by donating to assist the victims (Sharif 1999).

Lastly, television viewing can alleviate stress of the viewers. Viewers, particularly, teenagers who are still in school need entertainment after a solid school day. As the saying goes, “all work and no play makes Jack a dull boy”. Teenagers will feel fatigued, pressured when their teachers and parents’ expectations on them to get good result increases. By watching television, they can concentrate on the shows and forget about all the hassle temporarily. After that, they will feel recharged and more motivated to finish their homework. Moreover, they can use television viewing as an opportunity to regain their focus and hence, will be able to view problems from another different perspective (Rutherford 2002).

In a nutshell, it is apparently true that television viewing is advantageous for the viewers if moderation is practised (Rutherford 2002). Everything has two sides of it, bad and good. As human beings, we should be able to differentiate these two and adapt only the good one. The effects of television viewing can be disastrous if we are to become couch potatoes, though, by managing our time wisely, we, in fact, can gain abundant benefits from television viewing.

Sunday, May 16, 2010

Argumentative essay final draf

Junk food is referred to any food with low nutritional value and considered to be unhealthy (Smith 2005). Lin (2005) also states in his article that the nutritional value of food has dropped over the past 30 years because people start to consume more and more junk food nowadays. According to Medical Association President, Dr Cray, junk foods prohibit students to get the adequate amount of nutrition they need in growth and this will reduce their learning potential (The Food Show 2005). In my opinion, I strongly support the banning of the sale of junk foods in school. Therefore, it is indispensably necessary for us to discuss the reasons why junk foods should be banned in schools.

Junk food is unhealthy. Most junk foods contain synthetic chemicals to improve the flavour and colour as well as to prolong the shelf life. Proven, many of these chemical additives are believed to cause behavioural problems in children, such as hyperactivity and poor concentration (Smith 2005). This theory is further supported by Caputo, a child psychologist, in The Food Show (2005). In addition, Lin (2005) also states that junk foods have high levels of fat, sugar and salt. These junk foods include takeaway foods, pre-packaged meals, sugary snack foods, instant noodles, potato chips and chocolate bars. Some of these junk foods will increase the calories level and lead to childhood obesity. This problem is getting worse as young people now seldom exercise. If childhood obesity is not handled carefully, heart diseases, osteoarthritis and some cancers will be the consequences in future. According to Dental Association, a drop in dental health of Australia primary-school children is also linked to the habit of eating junk food.

In addition, schools have the responsibility to take care of the students' welfare and safety, including their health (The Food Show 2005). According to Lin (2005), thirty years ago most students brought home-made food such as sandwiches and fruits to school rather than eating in school canteens. On contrary, many students nowadays consume junk food as their lunch in schools. Lin (2005) also quotes from Reynolds that the sale of junk foods in school is one main contributor to obesity in youngsters nowadays. Reynolds also claims that healthy foods in canteen can help the schools to establish healthy food policies more efficiently as the students will get appropriate knowledge about good nutrition and good practice of balanced diets. If the sale of junk foods is not banned, the students may think eating junk foods has no spillover effects. In short, the banning of the sale of junk foods is necessary to ensure a healthy lifestyle led by the students at home as well as in school.

Another problem which is caused by the sale of junk foods is the increase in litter as students just throw away cans, crisps packets, cartons, and plastic containers everywhere in school compounds. If the sale of junk foods is banned in schools, the litter amount will be greatly reduced. As a result, school groundsman can take shorter time to clean the school grounds and thus spend more time in maintenance projects (The Food Show 2005). Besides, litter is considered as a safety and health hazard and it also causes the cleaning costs to rise and brings down the image of our communities (Smith 2005). Last but not least, according to Jack Green, a teacher in Hillview Primary School, in The Food Show (2005), after his school has banned junk foods in the school canteen, there is an impressive improvement of students’ attitudes in class, particularly that they have become less hyperactive after lunch.

In a nutshell, junk foods must be banned in schools. Childhood obesity should not be underestimated because serious health problems will arise in future out of unbalanced diets now. Foods such as biscuits, cookies, confectionery, hamburgers and soft drinks have low nutritional value and therefore should be avoided in daily diets (Health Foundation 2005). Furthermore, government should provide funds to support health policies in schools. It is only a small price to pay for the future health of our country (Lin 2005).

Thursday, May 6, 2010

Argumentative essay draft #2

Junk food is referred to any food with low nutritional value and considered to be unhealthy. (Smith 2005) Lin (2005) also states in his article that the nutritional value of food has dropped over the past 30 years because people start to consume more and more junk food nowadays. According to Medical Association President, Dr Cray, junk foods prohibit students to get the adequate amount of nutrition they need in growth and this will reduce their learning potential. (The Food Show 2005) In my opinion, I strongly support the banning of the sale of junk foods in school. Therefore, it is indispensably necessary for us to discuss the reasons why junk foods should be banned in schools.

Junk food is unhealthy. Most junk foods contain synthetic chemicals to improve the flavour and colour as well as to prolong the shelf life. Proven, many of these chemical additives are believed to cause behavioural problems in children, such as hyperactivity and poor concentration. (Smith 2005) This theory is further supported by Caputo, a child psychologists, in The Food Show (2005). In addition, Lin (2005) also states that junk foods have high levels of fat, sugar and salt. These junk foods include takeaway foods, pre-packaged meals, sugary snack foods, instant noodles, potato chips and chocolate bars. Some of these junk foods will increase the calories level and lead to childhood obesity. This problem is getting worse as young people now seldom exercise. If childhood obesity is not handled carefully, heart diseases, osteoarthritis and some cancers will be the consequences in future. According to Dental Association, a drop in dental health of Australia primary-school children is also linked to the habit of eating junk food.

In addition, schools have the responsibility to take care of the students' welfare and safety, including their health. (The Food Show 2005) According to Lin (2005), thirty years ago most students brought home-made food such as sandwiches and fruits to school rather than eating in school canteens. On contrary, many students nowadays consume junk food as their lunch in schools. Lin (2005) also quotes from Reynolds that the sale of junk foods in school is one main contributor to obesity in youngsters nowadays. Reynolds also claims that healthy foods in canteen can help the schools to establish healthy food policies more efficiently as the students will get appropriate knowledge about good nutrition and good practice of balanced diets. If the sale of junk foods is not banned, the students may think eating junk foods has no spillover effects. In short, the banning of the sale of junk foods are necessary to ensure a healthy lifestyle led by the students at home as well as in school.

Another problem which is caused by the sale of junk foods is the increase in litter as students just throw away cans, crisps packets, cartons, and plastic containers everywhere in school compounds. If the sale of junk foods is banned in schools, the litter amount will be greatly reduced. As a result, school groundsman can take shorter time to clean the school grounds and thus spend more time in maintenance projects. (The Food Show 2005) Besides, litter is considered as a safety and health hazard and it also causes the cleaning costs to rise and brings down the image of our communities. (Smith 2005) Last but not least, according to Jack Green, a teacher in Hillview Primary School, in The Food Show (2005),after his school has banned junk foods in the school canteen, there is an impressive improvement of students’ attitudes in class, particularly that they have become less hyperactive after lunch.

In a nutshell, junk foods must be banned in schools. Childhood obesity should not be underestimated because serious health problems will arise in future out of unbalanced diets now. Foods such as biscuits, cookies, confectionery, hamburgers and soft drinks have low nutritional value and therefore should be avoided in daily diets. (Health Foundation 2005) Furthermore, government should provide funds to support health policies in schools. It is only a small price to pay for the future health of our country. (Lin 2005)